“This income preference is more pronounced for women.” The takeaway: As much as we like to think we are beyond the days of Jane Austen, when suitors were evaluated largely based on how much money they brought in – the famous Mr. “When you are becoming serious, you need to consider what your partner is bringing to the table besides love and a good time.
The question becomes one about the potential to earn the income needed to build wealth and live a lifestyle you want.” Just think about the numerous economic judgments we are making while dating online.
Indeed, the tall, rich guy with a full head of hair is probably off the market already, she says.
Wait too long for an ideal person, and you could miss out on quality matches, who will eventually be snapped up themselves.
It will take more time to sift through that broader pool, but that is better than “artificially reducing the size of your search sample,” she says.
Our proven track record of 14 years strongly suggests that we are not only a successful site, but our staff and approach to this business is of exceptional standards that time and again delivers quality.
In terms of long-term economic security, it is better to partner with someone who makes ,000 annually but lives below their means, than someone who makes 0,000 a year but spends wildly and racks up debt.
“Money itself is not nearly as important as are money habits,” says Robert Braglia, a financial planner in New York.