They do this by offering often bizarre POV statements on sexuality, by suggesting that paedophilia is tolerated in certain cultures and by confusing the distinction between sex with prepubescent children (i.e. This muddying of the waters obviously plays into the hands of those who try to promote acceptance of paedophilia by appealing to a degree of tolerance of sexual relationships between adults and relatively mature adolescents.
Please acquaint yourselves with Wikipedia policies and stop using Wikipedia to push your agenda WP: NOT.
I see gentle sexual intimacy between children and adults as natural and non-harmful.
I am not a pedophile, but I am pro pedophile rights and children's rights not to be messed up with anti-sex nonsense.
Pedophilia isn't "about sex with children below 10-13," it's an attraction.
In my opinion, sexual relations between adults and children shouldn't be legalized, but at least provide a real argument for it, not: "sex with prepubescent children constitutes one of the severest forms of child abuse." 24ip | lolol , 6 September 2005 (UTC)You did not in the least respond to my justification for removing large parts of the section on cultural norms.
I would assume children under that age of 10 generally (although some girls reach puberty at age 7).This paragraph attempts to summarise the history of sex in 20th century Western society to draw a POV conclusion regarding sexual enjoyment.This has strictly nothing to do with paedophilia - that is, unless one regards paedophilia as a natural aspect of human sexuality and pursues an agenda of portraying paedophilia as a way of attaining sexual enjoyment. Also, if you paedophile activists really think that the increased public concern about paedophilia is a result of a Victorian views of sexuality, I'd say that you're deeply in denial: sex with prepubescent children constitutes one of the severest forms of child abuse.I disagree with removal based more on an ideological stance than a particular desire to improve the article.For those who added this information in the first place, I hope you can source everything, explain the direct bearing on the subject of pedophilia, neutralise any POV language, and get it all put back up --Kate--1.101 , 7 September 2005 (UTC)We are here to write a NPOV article appropriate for a high-quality encyclopedia in accordance with Wikipedia policies.