Good question for dating site

By contrast, moral evils do result from the intentions or negligence of moral agents. Evil in the broad sense, which includes all natural and moral evils, tends to be the sort of evil referenced in theological contexts...[T]he narrow concept of evil picks out only the most morally despicable... To call an action evil is to suggest that it cannot [be fitted in]..." Christian philosophers and theologians such as Richard Swinburne and N. Wright also define evil in terms of effect saying an "..is objectively good (or bad) if it is good (or bad) in its consequences".The broad concept picks out any bad state of affairs...[and] has been divided into two categories: natural evil and moral evil.[it] involves moral condemnation, [and] is appropriately ascribed only to moral agents and their actions." Philosopher [Susan Nieman] says "a crime against humanity is something for which we have procedures, ... Writers in this tradition saw things as belonging to 'forms' and evil as an absence of being a good example of their form: as a deficit of goodness where goodness ought to have been present. Augustine also defined evil as an absence of good, as did theologian and monk Thomas Aquinas who said: "...a man is called bad insofar as he lacks a virtue, and an eye is called bad insofar as it lacks the power of sight." Immanuel Kant was the first to offer a purely secular theory of evil, giving an evaluative definition of evil based on its cause as having a will that is not fully good.such a being could not make me exist and not exist at the same time but he could eliminate the stars...

good question for dating site-15good question for dating site-23good question for dating site-65

"For example, Laurence Thomas believes that evildoers take delight in causing harm or feel hatred toward their victims (Thomas 1993, 76–77)." Christian theologians generally define evil in terms of both human responsibility and the nature of God: "If we take the essentialist view of Christian ethics...

evil is anything contrary to God's good nature...(character or attributes)." The Judaic view, while acknowledging the difference between the human and divine perspective of evil, is rooted in the nature of creation itself and the limitation inherent in matter's capacity to be perfected; the action of freewill includes the potential for perfection from individual effort and leaves the responsibility for evil in human hands.

Within Christianity "God is supposed to be in some way personal...

Natural evils are bad states of affairs which do not result from the intentions or negligence of moral agents.

Hurricanes and toothaches are examples of natural evils.

Leave a Reply